The Core Microbiome of a Saltwater Aquarium

What’s in the microbiome of a saltwater aquarium?

Aquarists have known for a long time that microbes played important roles in our aquariums, but have been unable to directly measure the microbial communities in their tanks until recently.

To better understand these microbial communities, I’ve teamed up with a group of local hobbyists and coral growers to sample microbial communities in a wide variety of tanks. In my new lab at AquaBiomics I used DNA sequencing to identify the different kinds of microbes present in each tank, and measure their relative abundance.

By comparing these communities across different tanks, I identified a core set of families found in nearly all aquariums we sampled. My goal in this report is to introduce these families of microbes, for aquarists interested in learning more about the microbes living in their own tanks.

How DNA sequencing is used to study the microbiome

For this study, my collaborators sampled seawater from multiple tanks using custom sampling kits I provided, then shipped the samples back to my lab at AquaBiomics. Altogether we sampled 20 tanks operated by 7 people, ranging from home display tanks to coral aquaculture facilities.

We chose to sample microbial populations in the water because this can be sampled more consistently across tanks than other strategies (e.g. sand, rock, etc.) I view this as analogous to sampling a patient’s blood to diagnose issues with their heart or liver. Our approach is supported by a recent study which found that water samples are ideal for measuring ecosystem disturbances on natural coral reefs.

Very few (probably <1%) of microbes can be grown in culture, so many researchers now use DNA sequencing to study these communities. I extracted DNA from each sample, and sequenced a genetic marker called 16S that’s been widely used for studies of microbial communities in natural habitats. To ensure that we sampled the community deeply enough to detect rare microbes, I analyzed about 10,000 DNA sequences per sample. By comparing these sequences with public databases, I identified the type of microbe from which each DNA sequence was extracted, and counted these sequences to evaluate the relative abundance of each type.

DNA sequencing to study the microbiome
Figure 1. (a) Microbes were sampled from saltwater aquariums, (b) their DNA was extracted and sequenced, and (c) each microbial type was identified and quantified to study the microbiomes of saltwater aquariums in this study.

Established saltwater aquariums support diverse microbial communities

These data revealed that the water circulating through a typical saltwater aquarium contains a complex mixture with hundreds of different kinds of microbes. In our survey of hobbyist and aquaculture systems we found 400 different types per tank on average.

The variation across aquariums was striking; the most diverse tank we sampled contained more than 7 times as many microbial types as the least diverse. Most tanks (80%) contained at least 300 microbial types, but some contained far fewer (Figure 2).

The range of diversity in tanks sampled for this study
Figure 2. The number of microbial types found in each aquarium we sampled. The dashed line indicates the average diversity. How does the microbiome in your tank compare?

Why does this diversity matter? After all, as aquarists we aren’t really interested in the names of the microbes, as much as we are in what they can do for us.

Classifying each microbe to the family level reveals that the hundreds of different types in each sample represented a large number of different families (90 different families per sample, on average).

These families have have different, characteristic metabolic activities and play different roles in nature and presumably in our aquariums. So this diversity is not just a matter of DNA sequences; the different kinds of microbes do different things.

Aquarists have often debated what makes a tank “mature”. From a microbial perspective, our analysis of established, mature saltwater aquariums establishes a target range for microbial diversity, providing an objective metric for determining the maturity of a new tank.

The aquarium water microbiome is dominated by a few families

In addition to identifying the kinds of microbes present in each sample, DNA sequencing provides information on each types’ relative abundance (in other words, the ratios between the different types). This analysis revealed that a relatively short list of families accounted for the majority of the aquarium water microbiome (Figure 3).

Abundance of each family in the core microbiome
Figure 3. The relative abundance of each family in the core microbiome of a typical saltwater aquarium.

These observations demonstrate that there is a core microbiome characteristic of mature saltwater aquariums. These families were present in almost every tank we sampled, and made up a relatively large fraction of the community in each tank. Disruptions of this core microbiome may contribute to otherwise unexplained problems like reduced water quality, nuisance algae, and coral or fish diseases.

To identify the core saltwater aquarium microbiome, we focused on the set of 19 families that each made up at least 1% of the community, on average. Together, these “core” families accounted for 73% of the total community. Two of these were especially abundant (Pelagibacteraceae and Flavobacteriaceae), each accounting for about 16% of the total community (Fig 3). The other “non-core” families (158) were each present in fewer tanks and at very low levels (0.17% of the community on average).

In the remainder of this article, we focus on describing these core families that account for the majority of the water microbiome across almost all tanks we sampled.

The 19 microbial families in the core aquarium microbiome

Each of these core families is described in the following table. These descriptions focus on marine members of each family, when specific information was available about marine groups. (Note: if this table does not display well on your mobile device, consider switching to the Desktop version of the site to view this table.)

Table 1

Microbial families of the core saltwater aquarium microbiome.
 FamilyDescriptionMetabolic capabilitiesEcological roles & responses
1Flavobacteriaceaegram-negative, rod-shaped, non-motile or gliding Bacteria (Bacteroidetes)Generally aerobic & chemoheterotrophicMost diverse family in Bacteroidetes; occurs in essentially all habitats. Specialized for degrading polysaccharides & proteins. Often the most abundant group in aquatic habitats. Frequently associated with surfaces, including animals, Macroalgae, or detritus.
2PelagibacteraceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped, free-living Bacteria (Alphaproteobacteria)Aerobic & chemoheterotrophicPreviously called SAR11, this is thought to be the most abundant bacterial group in the ocean worldwide. Well-adapted for life in the low-nutrient waters of the open ocean. Require reduced sulfur compounds, glycine, and dissolved organic carbon for growth.
3RhodobacteraceaeGram-negative Bacteria (Alphaproteobacteria), mostly rod-shaped, some free-livingMostly aerobic & chemoheterotrophic, some photoheterotrophicExtremely diverse, widely distributed and highly abundant in marine habitats including open ocean, sediments, and algal biofilms. Degrade sulfur-containing compounds (e.g. sulfite, DMSP). Many use methylated amines (MA) as primary nitrogen source.
4VibrionaceaeGram negative, motile, Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria); curved or straight rod-shapedAerobic or anerobic; chemoheterotrophic, photoautotrophic, or chemoautotrophic; some biolumenescent. Widely distributed in marine habitats, including many associations with animals. This family includes many human or animal pathogens, including bacteria that can cause wound infection from exposure to contaminated water.
5AlteromonadaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped, motile Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria)Aerobic & chemoheterotrophicWidely observed in seawater samples. Can use a broad range of dissolved nutrients including sugars and amino acids, and blooms in high glucose conditions.
6CryomorphaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped or filamentous Bacteria (Bacteroidetes). Non-motile or gliding. Aerobic or facultatively anerobic; chemoheterotrophic.Primarily marine microbes, with some freshwater members. Generally surface-associated. Not primary degraders, but contribute to secondary production. Metabolizes amino acids and other organic acids. Nutritonal requirements remain poorly defined, but supported by organic extracts (e.g. yeast).
7OceanospirillaceaeGram-negative, spiral- or rod-shaped, motile Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria)Aerobic & chemoheterotrophicAlmost exclusively marine. Grows on amino acids, other organic acids, and ammonia. Contributes to biofilm communities, and growth is stimulated by nutrient enrichment (C, N, & P).
8PseudoalteromonadaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped or round, motile Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria)Aerobic & chemoheterotrophicEcologically important in a wide variety of marine habitats. Produce a variety of bioactive compounds, including many antimicrobial or antiviral comounds. Plays important roles in the formatin of biofilms. Can inhibit establishment and growth of algae. High molecular weight DOM promotes growth of this family.
9MycobacteriaceaeNot truly gram-positive or negative, rod-shaped, non-motile Bacteria (Actinobacteria)Aerobic; mostly chemoheterorophicGrows on a variety of simple sugars, alcohols, or hydrocarbons. Growth is promoted by addition of fatty acids. Not generally pathogenic or symbiotic, but includes a few very important human pathogens (leprosy, tuberculosis). Includes the aquarium-related pathogen M. marinum (‘fish-tank granuloma’).
10FusobacteriaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped or round, non-motile Bacteria (Fusobacteria)Anaerobic or microaerophilic, chemoheterotrophicOccurs in a variety of habitats. Ferments organic nutrients including carbohydrates, amino acids, and peptides. Found in sediments and associated with animals.
11HyphomicrobiaceaeGram-negative Bacteria (Alphaproteobacteria) with round to rod-shaped cells, some motileIncludes chemoheterotrophic, methylotrophic, chemolitoautotrophic, and photosyntheticFound in essentially every habitat. Grows on organic acids and sugars.
12SaprospiraceaeGram-negative rod-shaped Bacteria (Bacteroidetes), some show gliding motilityAerobic & chemoheterotrophicPrimarily marine, some freshwater. Typically associated with sediments, multicellular organisms, or other surfaces. Capable of breaking down and living on complex macromolecules (e.g. polysaccharides, proteins). Some prey on other bacteria or algae, suggesting a role for this group in controlling algal growth on surfaces.
13BacteriovoracaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped, motile Bacteria (Deltaproteobacteria)Aerobic or anerobic; chemoheterotrophicWidely distributed across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Obligate predators of other gram-negative bacteria. Play important roles in controlling microbial community size and diversity.
14BacillaceaeGram-positive, rod-shaped, motile Bacteria (Firmicutes)Aerobic or anaerobic; chemoheterotrophicThe hardiest and mos widely distributed group of bacteria. Spore-forming. Found throughout aquatic and terrestrial habitats, often in association with plants or animals. Primarily saprophytic. Plays important roles in nutrient cycling. Capable of degrading and living on complex macromolecules or simple sugars. Blooms rapidly in response to nutrient addition.
15FlammeovirgaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped Bacteria (Bacteroidetes)Aerobic or anaerobic; chemoheterotrophicOccurs in both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Commonly observed in marine sediments. Litle information is available on their activity.
16PiscirickettsiaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped, Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria), some motileAerobic & chemoheterotrophicA diverse group with a broad range of activities. Includes methylotrophic bacteria with important roles in carbon cycles, and a fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis
17CenarchaeaceaeRound or rod-shaped Archaea (Thaumarchaeota), some motileAerobic, chemoautotrophicFound in essentially all habitats including extreme environments. Important ammonia-oxidizing activities, especially when ammonia levels are low; ammonia-oxidizing Archaea consume more ammonia than AOB.
18ComamonadaceaeGram-negative, round or rod-shaped Bacteria (Betaproteobacteria), some motileGenerally aerobic heterotrophic; many exceptionsA large and diverse group that includes a wide range of lifestyles. Occurs in soil and water samples from a wide range of habitats, and in association with plants or animals. Most are free-living saprophytes. Some grow autotrophically on hydrogen or nitrate.
19MarinicellaceaeGram-negative, rod-shaped, non-motile Bacteria (Gammaproteobacteria)Aerobic & chemoheterotrophicNewly described family occuring in seawater samples. Little information is available on its ecological roles. Requires salt and organic nutrients (e.g. hydrolyzed proteins) for growth.

Microbes of special interest for aquarists

At the beginning of the project we recognized that there were several groups of microbes aquarists would be interested in. These include microbes with known roles in nutrient processing, nuisance ‘algae’ (cyanobacteria), and pathogens. We screened for these groups in each sample regardless of their abundance, reasoning that aquarists would like to know if there was even a single DNA sequence from a pathogen in their tanks.
 

Table 2

The average abundance of microbial groups of interest in a typical saltwater aquarium.
GroupTypes foundAverage % of community
Ammonia-oxidizing BacteriaNitrosomonadaceae, Nitrosococcus0.67%
Ammonia-oxidizing ArchaeaCenarchaeaceae0.85%
Nitrite-oxidizing BacteriaNitrobacter, Nitrospinaceae, Nitrospiraceae0.14%
CyanobacteriaAcaryochloridaceae, Phormidiaceae, Pseudanabaenaceae, Synechococcaceae, Ulvophyceae, Xenococcaceae0.32%
Fish pathogensPhotobacterium damselae, Piscirickettsia salmonis0.07%
Coral pathogensnone0.00%
 
As expected for saltwater aquariums with mature microbial biofilms, we found clear evidence of microbial groups capable of processing ammonia into nitrite, and processing nitrite into nitrate. The ammonia oxidizing community included both ammonia oxidizing Archaea (AOA) and ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB). Together this group accounted for 1.5% of the microbiome on average.
 
These microbes (AOA & AOB) were 11-times more abundant than the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in water samples.
 
The relatively low abundance of both groups in water samples probably results from their growth as part of the biofilm community rather than as free-living members of the bacterioplankton. Although our study shows these groups are present in water samples, in order to increase the sensitivity for detection of these important groups we have subsequently added a biofilm sampling step to the sampling protocol.
 
The average aquarium in our study contained Cyanobacteria (Table 2), although these made up a very small fraction of the community in water samples (0.32%). We found various combinations of up to six different families in various tanks. With this diagnostic tool in hand, it will be interesting in future studies to explore how different families respond to various efforts to eliminate these nuisance ‘algae’.
 
The generally healthy tanks we sampled for this study contained very few known pathogens. We screened for 41 different fish pathogens, and found only 2 types, at low levels, in a couple of tanks (0.07% on average). One tank contained Photobacterium damselae, the pathogen responsible for photobacteriosis. Another tank contained Piscirickettsia salmonis, which causes piscirickettsiosis in Salmon and related fish. Neither of these tank’s owners reported symptoms in their fish, so these low levels may be below the thresholds needed for a disease outbreak.
 
We screened for 9 different coral pathogens, and found no evidence of these in any tanks sampled for this study.
 
Overall, these data demonstrate that sampling the water microbiome in a saltwater aquarium provides insights into the populations of many microbial groups of interest for aquarists, confirming the presence of nutrient processing microbes and the absence of pathogens.
 

Summary

This study provides a first glimpse into the specific microbial communities characteristic of home saltwater aquariums. It’s too complex a dataset to summarize entirely in one article. Here, I’ve focused on the families of microbes present at consistently high levels across different tanks, to describe the core microbiome of a saltwater aquarium. These data show that:
 
      1. The water in a typical reef tank contains hundreds of different types of microbes with diverse metabolic capabilities.
      2. The aquarium microbiome is dominated by a core set of 19 families that are relatively abundant in most tanks.
      3. Bacteria made up most of the aquarium microbiome, but the small number of Archaea include types with important roles in nutrient processing
      4. Sampling the water of a saltwater aquarium allows for detection of specific beneficial microbes or pathogens
      5. The differences in metabolic capabilities and nutritional requirements in the core saltwater aquarium microbiome suggest that the microbiome composition can affect dissolved nutrient levels, and vice versa.
 
Now that analysis of aquarium microbiomes is readily available, it will be exciting to see what we learn about the effects of aquarium husbandry practices or additives on the microbial communities in our tanks.
 
This article described the average microbiome. In the next, I’ll focus on the differences we found between tanks. Stay tuned!
 
-Eli Meyer, AquaBiomics

Note: most of these are not publicly accessible. Sometimes the authoritative source is not made publicly available by the publishers. I include the list for readers with institutional access who wish to look into the sources on which I based this article. 

Ortmann, A. C., & Santos, T. T. (2016). Spatial and temporal patterns in the Pelagibacteraceae across an estuarine gradient. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(9), fiw133.
Stieglmeier, M., Alves, R. J., & Schleper, C. (2014). The phylum thaumarchaeota. The Prokaryotes: Other Major Lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea, 347–362.
Rosenberg, E., DeLong, E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., & Thompson, F. (2013). The prokaryotes: prokaryotic communities and ecophysiology. Springer.
Mandic-Mulec, I., & Stefanic, P. (2015). Ecology of Bacillaceae. Microbiology Spectrum, 3(2), TBS–0017.
Rotem, O., Pasternak, Z., & Jurkevitch, E. (2014). Bdellovibrio and Like Organisms. In E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, S. Lory, E. Stackebrandt, & F. Thompson (Eds.), The Prokaryotes: Deltaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria (pp. 3–17). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39044-9_379
McIlroy, S. J., & Nielsen, P. H. (2014). The Family Saprospiraceae. In E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, S. Lory, E. Stackebrandt, & F. Thompson (Eds.), The Prokaryotes: Other Major Lineages of Bacteria and The Archaea (pp. 863–889). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38954-2_138
Lory, S. (2014). The Family Mycobacteriaceae. In E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, S. Lory, E. Stackebrandt, & F. Thompson (Eds.), The Prokaryotes: Actinobacteria (pp. 571–575). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30138-4_339
Bowman, J. (2007). Bioactive compound synthetic capacity and ecological significance of marine bacterial genus Pseudoalteromonas. Marine Drugs, 5(4), 220–241.
Ivanova, E. P., Ng, H. J., & Webb, H. K. (2014). The Family Pseudoalteromonadaceae. In E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, S. Lory, E. Stackebrandt, & F. Thompson (Eds.), The Prokaryotes: Gammaproteobacteria (pp. 575–582). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38922-1_229
Lawes, J. C., Neilan, B. A., Brown, M. V., Clark, G. F., & Johnston, E. L. (2016). Elevated nutrients change bacterial community composition and connectivity: high throughput sequencing of young marine biofilms. Biofouling, 32(1), 57–69.
Bowman, J. P. (2014). The family cryomorphaceae. The Prokaryotes: Other Major Lineages of Bacteria and the Archaea, 539–550.
Allers, E., Gómez-Consarnau, L., Pinhassi, J., Gasol, J. M., Šimek, K., & Pernthaler, J. (2007). Response of Alteromonadaceae and Rhodobacteriaceae to glucose and phosphorus manipulation in marine mesocosms. Environmental Microbiology, 9(10), 2417–2429.
Ivanova, E. P., & Mikhailov, V. V. (2001). A new family, Alteromonadaceae fam. nov., including marine proteobacteria of the genera Alteromonas, Pseudoalteromonas, Idiomarina, and Colwellia. Microbiology, 70(1), 10–17.
FARMER III, J. (2006). The Family Vibrionaceae. Prokaryotes, 6, 495–507.
BERNARDET, J.-F., & NAKAGAWA, Y. (2006). An Introduction to the Family Flavobacteriaceae. Prokaryotes, 7, 455–480.
Chen, Y. (2012). Comparative genomics of methylated amine utilization by marine Roseobacter clade bacteria and development of functional gene markers (tmm, gmaS). Environmental Microbiology, 14(9), 2308–2322.
Pujalte, M. J., Lucena, T., Ruvira, M. A., Arahal, D. R., & Macián, M. C. (2014). The family rhodobacteraceae. The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, 439–512.
Giovannoni, S. J. (2017). SAR11 bacteria: the most abundant plankton in the oceans. Annual Review of Marine Science, 9, 231–255.

1 thought on “The core microbiome of a saltwater aquarium

  1. Oceanana1.com, thanks for sharing. We’re excited. Thanks, comrade

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© Aquabiomics LLC, 2019 | About us | Contact us | FAQ